Module 2 Exercises: Top Half Comparisons
Please use an email address that you access regularly - we will use it to correspond if needed, as well as track your responses across different modules.

Please refrain from using different email addresses for the exercises in different modules, as we won't be able to uniquely identify your submissions (or in plain English, you'll look like several different people)!
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Email *
Name *
Why do judges use clashes when evaluating a debate? *
Which of the following can constitute analysis when comparing between teams? *
Select all that apply.
Required
Which of the following is most correct? *
In a top half debate, OG focused exclusively on a clash which, in your opinion, would be less important to the average reasonable person. However, OO focused exclusively on another clash which, in your opinion, was more important to the average reasonable person. Neither team justified why they chose to focus their case in the way they did. As you might expect, because both teams focused on different clashes, they each won their respective clash to largely similar extents. The CG team extended by introducing new material that defeated OO on the more important clash that they had chosen. (Select all that apply.)
Required
Which of these are valid reasons for a judge to treat a team's argument as significantly less persuasive? *
Select all that apply.
Required
When evaluating the persuasiveness of a principled argument, judges should... *
Select all that apply.
Required
What does the term 'competing rebuttal' refer to? *
Select all that apply.
Required
Next
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy